Vincent Technical
Sections: -Serial
Numbers/Production-
Photo Gallery of Models - Brakes
- Engine
Overhaul - Vincent
Engines - Wheels/Fenders
- Instruments - Transmission
- Clutch - Magneto
- Tank/Seat - Suspension
-
Tools - Norvin
-
Electrics-
Carburetors
- Misc - Links
-Vincent
Parts/Services Suppliers - Polishing/Cleaning
- Shipping Vincents-Electric
Starter - Paint/Transfers
THE VINCENT MOTORCYCLE SUSPENSION
SYSTEM
(
Photo of modified rear strut)
Brampton Forks:
The ‘A’ item has a longer stem plus the handlebar
clamps clamp to the top of the forks whereas on the ‘B’ Bramptons the handlebar
clamp is brazed to the forks and immovable. The damper is a brass butterfly
nut which was replaced by a bakelite knob on the later units. Provision
is made for the fitment of a tyre inflator on the leading edge of the n/s
leg. TTR forks are quite different from the standard. Humphrey
4/23/07
Front Forks:
Whenever I've taken forks apart to renew worn eccentric bushes I've always
found that the bushes have been turning in the link and worn the
bores in the eyes of the link. What I now
do is to line bore the link and fit oversize bushes with a modest
amount of interference and arrange the length so that the bushes
don't quite meet in the centre. I then drill and tap 4 BA down through
this gap in about the 2 o'clock position and countersink the hole to take
a countersunk screw of a length that just clears the surface of the eccentric.
This stops the bushes from turning and every so often you can remove the
screw and pump some oil in with a pressure can and see it come out
around the side plates. I also drill the ends of the other three spindles
3/32" diam. and countersink, and then cross drill the shafts 1/16" diam.
at a position that's roughly in the middle of the bushes. Again you use
a pressure can to pump oil in until it appears at the outside. I believe
that most fork wear occurs not from being used but from being used dry
and un -lubricated. Roy Cross 4/20/07
Girdraulic fork bushes:
I still use bronze for the eccentric bushes
as I feel that the bearing surface is a bit narrow for plastic. Because
there is not a lot of metal around the eccentric eyes of the link one can't
use too much inteference when pressing the bushes in. Whenever I've
taken forks apart to renew worn eccentric bushes I've always found that
the bushes have been turning in the link and worn the bores in the eyes
of the link. What I now do is to line bore the link and fit oversize bushes
with a modest amount of interference and arrange the length so that the
bushes don't quite meet in the centre. I then drill and tap 4 BA down through
this gap in about the 2 o'clock position and countersink the hole to take
a countersunk screw of a length that just clears the surface of the eccentric.
This stops the bushes from turning and every so often you can remove the
screw and pump some oil in with a pressure can and see it come out around
the side plates. I also drill the ends of the other three spindles 3/32"
diam. and countersink, and then cross drill the shafts 1/16" diam. at a
position that's roughly in the middle of the bushes. Again you use
a pressure can to pump oil in until it appears at the outside. I
believe that most fork wear occurs not from being used but from being used
dry and un -lubricated. Roy Cross 2-26-07
Filling an original Vincent shock absorber:
First , a tip I forgot . With the recessed
type later D9/2 plug just below the bottom O ring
that causes problems , just fit a thin shim there below the ring to ensure
it remains in its groove . When filling I
like to use a transparent plastic bottle { so the air bubbles are visable
} at least a pint in size , with a spout tipped
cap . Fill with your chosen fork fluid . With the
damper held by its top eye in a vice - tipped a bit towards
you , and its filler plug opening upper most
you screw in the plastic fill bottle tip into the opening a
couple of turns { the end of the tip
cut off of course } . Now with the fluid
flowing down into the damper body you begin to stroke
the damper slowly over its full travel squeezing the
bottle as the damper is extended , relaxing it as as
its shoved inwards . You will see the fluid going in
and the bubbles rising out and into the bottle . Continue
until no more bubbles are coaxed out , indicating
the oil has replaced the air within . Rotate the body left
and right to move the last bubbles tqwards the bottle spout
, also you can slack off the vice jaws and
lift the damper free . Then to tip it from side to side
- the bottle still in place - the aim to coax
any bubbles left inside to travel towards the filler plug hole
and up into the bottle . Finish with the damper pulled fully
out to max length . Nows the trick . Replace in the vice as
before . Rotate a bit to one side and quickly remove
the bottle with its spout , rotating back uppermost .
Fit the filler plug in about one turn only . Wrap a shop
cloth around the body and then slowly begin
to force the damper closed . The oil will issue
out around the plug threads - sopped up by the rag as the
shaft enters the body . You may need to ease out the plug a
quarter turn to allow the oil to escape .
Now this is important . DONT close it up
completely , stop with a quarter inch of shaft
still showing outside the top cap where its entering through
the hole - seen between the top eye fixture and
the top threaded body plug . This
is the trick it took me ages to learn . Not to
expel ALL the oil the shaft could displace . Stopping
short as described , you now tighten the plug fully .
Wipe off all exterior oil . Stroke
it a few times and leave it fully extended ,
and hang it up from its TOP eye overnite
. The next day stroke it firmly in the
normal vertical position , it should feel quite
solid . Hang it up again for a few more hours if it
has a soft area of movement , repeat the last
step . If the floating disc is retained for front fork
use it will ALWAYS have a soft movement if
moved slowly , however if moved quickly the
force necessary to COMPRESS it will be
much greater , a sign the 2 rate damping
function is working .
If the action is not consistant you did not get
out all the air , and may have to repeat the earlier steps
trying to improve on the initial attempt .
A good hydralic sealant is needed on the top body
plug threads to prevent oil loss past those
threads . This entire filling process is
difficult to describe - but logic will direct you .
The object is to replace all the air inside with the liquid
, certainly easy - or should
be . Its tricky tho . Sid .
RFM Frame Lugs:
The majority of post-war RFM end lugs were forged, the dies still exist;
I say the majority as I don't know for sure whether the first post-war
ones were cast or not, but cast versions seem unlikely given the Series
'A' production run. As such I'm fairly certain that the material would
have been a low-ish grade steel. IMHO, the problems are partially
due to the jig used for machining the bore which accepts the lower UFM
(horizontal) tube; depending on how the operator set this up, the wall
thickness could end up being v. thin on one side and sometimes did, now
aggravate this with 50 years of owners with no mechanical sympathy slamming
the bicycle back on to its rear stand, or pounding away on the kickstart
with the bicycle on its stand and the results speak for themselves. Remember
that most of the later joints at this point were pinned before brazing,
so when disassembling the joint be aware that the brass may be fluid but
you'll have to locate the pin as well - and good luck too!
Note also that there are two types of end lug,
the later ones did not have the 'half thickness' relief between the tapped
boss for the rear stand and large dia. hole (tapped on earlier models),
as shown in MO22; however as far as I'm aware the same part No. 'FT9' was
retained to the end.
Malleable Iron is now difficult to get as it requires
accurate temperature control and special furnaces, as such foundries have,
by and large, stopped making it; it has been virtually completely superseded
by Spheroidal Graphite Cast Iron, cheaper and more easily produced.
Frank Griffin 9/11/05
Birmabright Fenders:
Proper specification Birmabright BB2. Produced by Bimetals Ltd.,
Birmabright Works, Clapgate Lane, Quinton, Birmingham, England. (now defunct)
Yhis material could hae also been called: Hinduminium 22, Alcan GB M57S,
BA 21, Alcoa 510 or Awco 21. These being the same thing, but produced
by other companies of that era. We only know it as Birmabright because
that's where the factory or mudguard manufacturer purchased it from.
Today we know this material as NS4 or in American terms 5251.
ISO designation: A1 MG2. I originally thought the material
to be an alclad; I hve now proven myself to have been wrong. Trevor
Southwell 5/28/05
Shock Absorber Seals:
Take with you the shaft D 4/i and seal holder D 12 and an old
ring and get thee to a Bearing Supply like Dixie Bearings. These
Viton O rings usually come in two specs., different in color and made to
handle more or less heat. Both work well and cost under a dollar
each. They are easily matched, simply needing to fit into the original
recess and exihibit a nice hug on the shaft. An important point. The upper
cutoff D 9/2 had gone through several changes, the later versions
having a top counterbore and radial oil escape holes, the earliest pattern
none of these. Where they lack these features, provide a shallow tapered
countebore and cut with a hacksaw blade two criss/cross shallow slots across
its upper face, these to allow bleed off of oil trapped above this face.
Clean any swarf in the slots and polish smooth on an oilstone. Then upon
assembly add a thin metal shim atop the D 9/2 to ensure that the bottom
ring does not pooch out of its recess. It is often found upon
stripping the later dampers having the Works machined deeper counterbore
with radial bleed off holes that the ring is lying usless and unsupported
in this tapered space, thus losing the effectiveness of that lower O ring.
Polish the shaft to extend the life of the new seals. Use a top brand of
Fork fluid, 20 wt ., to which I usually add a dollup of 50 wt. motor oil
to thicken a bit and add extra lubricant. Sid Biberman 2/17/03
Handling Problems:
I'd
pull the rear wheel and check the rear wheel bearings. Vins have a tendency
to have the wheel bearings start "walking" in the rear. It happened to
me once. My bike would "wallow" in corners. I pulled the wheel, noted that
the outer race was loose, shimmed it using some beer can as shim stock,
and then loctited it in. One of the best fixes I ever saw was when
Charlie Taylor took an old feeler gauge and wrapped it around the outer
race. I couldn't get it out years later. I've seen this happen on numerous
Vins. Somer 7/16/02
Filling Original Dampers:
What I have made is a funnel with a 1/8 BSP adaptor on the end to screw
into the damper. This can then be filled and left for a while until all
the oil has run into the damper, leave for a day and then do as the instructions
tell you, compress until almost home , the oil comes back into the funnel.
I forgot to mention the adaptor is fitted with a tap, that can be closed
to cut off the flow. So when the damper is nearly compressed shut the tap
and remove funnel, fit plug loosely, then compress the last bit and screw
the plug up tight. The idea is to keep any air out of the system. Trevor
3/24/02
Removing the Front Spring Boxes:
I was shown a method many years ago that is efficient and requires only
about four and a half feet of strong cord and, if you don't want
to remove your front wheel, a 9inch length of 1/2 inch diameter steel.
First, you raise the front wheel off the ground
with either the front stands or a jack. You then loosen the front
wheel spindle and remove the nut, but leave the spindle in place.
Thread the cord behind the spring box and tie the two ends securely together
to form a closed loop. Place the top end of the loop over the top
of the spring box behind the bearing bush. (You can use a piece of
rag under the cord to protect your paintwork) Place the lower end
of the loop over one of the protrusions of the tommy bar. Now using
the protruding end of the spindle immediately inside of the tommy bar as
a pulley allow the cord to wind round this while slowly turning the spindle
with the tommy bar. As you will now see you are using the spindle
and tommy bar as a windlass and you can tighten the cord until it starts
to compress the spring. Now you can remove the top spring box mounting
bolt. If, as you remove the bolt, you gently push and pull the spring
box in and out on the bolt you can easily feel if you are taking the spring
tension off the bolt to the right amount to allow free removal of it.
Having removed the bolt the windlass can be released and the top half of
the spring box can be removed to change the spring or the bottom mount
removed and the whole unit removed from the forks. When one side
of the forks has been dealt with, you knock out the wheel spindle with
the length of 1/2inch diameter steel, ( rounding and tapering the
leading end of this piece of steel helps the alignment) so that it
takes the place of the spindle. You then knock out the piece of steel
with the spindle from the opposite side of the forks and the spindle can
then be used as a windlass to remove the other spring box. I in fact
use a spare wheel spindle to knock ou the one in use and use it as my second
windlass, before replacing the spindle in it's original position.
This procedure saves having to move brake cables and reset brakes etc.
Of course if you are removing the wheel you do not need to go through this
procedure.
The whole procedure can be carried out in less time
than it has taken to type these instructions. A couple of weeks ago
I replaced both my front springs in under an hour. I hope this is
of use to those members who do not have the facilities to make special
tools. D.J.P. 04/25/01
Derek's method to remove the
spring boxes is quite effective.
Last weekend I used a modification and what I consider an improvement to
that method: Instead of using a cord and and using the front spindle
as a windliss I used a ratcheting tie down. For final alignment during
re-installation I used a jack under the front of the engine. Basically
this is the recommendation provided in the Thornton instructions.
Both procedures work like a charm. Doug Wood 04/25/01
Rebuilding Shocks:
The authorities will tell you that you can send the dampers back to VOC
for "professional rebuilding" and get them back for only $100. I
did it. It's really true . But the last 2 dampers I did myself and it was
no big deal. I guess the trickiest part is getting the big eye off
the top of the shaft. There should be a small pin below the eye you can
punch out (part 966 in drawing M063). Now clamp the shaft and unscrew the
eye (D8). Don't scratch or Mar the Shaft! Then carefully grip the
flats of part D13 in a vise and put a rod through the other eye and unscrew
again. Now the whole guts should come out. I
found that by carefully smoothing the shaft -
working up to up to 600 grit paper and polishing it, it then had a chance
of sealing against the o-rings. I then replaced both the o-rings (D11)
, making sure the barrels were in good shape, reassembled , refilled and
tested them. That was all it took. There's a good section in the instruction
sheets but many sets are missing sections #10
and #12. Mike Hebb 04/24/01
Powder Coating Girdraulics:
To anneal aluminium, it is heated to a certain temperature, depending on
its spec. , and then quenched,( Water,hot water, oil,or air , again depending
on spec). This is usually 360 degrees C. and over for twenty minutes.
Heat treatment is used to improve the mechanical
properties of the material. This is done by one of two means.
1. Solution treating , which is heating to a
certain temperature for a certain time, and a controlled cooling period.
2. Natural ageing. which is what it says, but
can be accelerated by heating to 100-200 degrees C. for anything from 3
hours to thirty hours, again depending on spec. this then would be called
artificial ageing. Personally , I do not think that the blades would have
been heat treated after forging, because the act of forging induces strengths
into the material . The piece of material that was placed in the
forging tools, would have been solution heat treated, then as I do not
know how many stages
the process took, would have probrably been treated(annealed)
after each stamping. After the final stamping it would probably been cooled
in boiling water.
Looking at my charts for room temperature ageing,
the process could be over in 120 hours. Again depending on spec.
So you can see that 200 is not going to affect
the blades. Trevor 03/31/01
Girdraulic Fork Blades
were made by Smiths Stampings in Coventry. Bristol Aircraft was a myth,
as I had always believed for years. Trevor 03/30/01
Remember that after you have shimmed your front wheel
the fit between the fork blades should
be a neat slide fit with no side movement or gap when sitting on the front
axle.If there is a gap and you tighten up the axle you will tighten up
the movement on your forks and handling will suffer. Doug Brodie
03/31/01
I had a couple of different sets
of springs made for my own twin, but was never happy with the result. Then
I came across the front and rear springs,
and spring boxes made by Justin Mackay
Smith (540) 837-2456 , a Virginia number. In my estimation Justin's
springs and boxes are among the safest and best handling around. His spring
boxes fit the springs as well. He makes only limited quantities and does
not advertise. I believe his set-up has literaly saved my bacon on more
than once occassion. Carl Hungness 03/09/01
Restoring Girdraulics:
Sequence - Strip the links, install the bushes, ream, mask off the spindle
bushes and very carefully mask the eccentric bushes with 3M pinstriping
tape (wonderful stuff, it is). I then paint and Very Carefully
remove the masking from the eccentric bushes while the final color coat
is still wet and flowable; this helps eliminate the paint ridge on
this exposed area. The spindle bushes are trimmed out by the cupped
washers, FF10, so the ridge left by masking is not critical.
I do my own paintwork and use catylized polyurethane or acrylic enamel.
Freidman 2/27/01
Do not use the above sequence if you are Stove
Enameling.. the oillite bushings will be destroyed. Trevor
Here in Indianapolis where I live
there are several Indianapolis 500 car teams and many attendant suppliers.
My own personal experience with the Vincent
shock absorbers tells me I would NOT utilize
them under any circumstances for today's modern traffic..even if they were
brand spanking new.
I brought a rebuilt Vincent shock, rebuilt
by a KNOWN mechanic within the industry and a NEW Thornton shock to the
Carrera Shock absorber company here in Speedway, Indiana...and the results
of the test were: "Carl, throw away the Vincent shock..it is dangerous.
This other shock (the Thornton) is great."
I rode the Thorntons, front and read for 25,000
miles and Dave Molloy (our Thornton distributor)offered to look them
over. They came back with a clean bill of health, no work needed. Yet,
I was still not satisfied..I had them tested on the shock dyno again..and
they were perfect.
While we all dearly love Philip Irving and his
designs, we should remember that in l946 the "airplane" type shock was
just coming into vogue. If memory serves correctly, Irving did in fact
design the first tubular airplane type shock for a motorcycle and I think
it went on a Velocette.Ielieve the VIncent got the next shock he designed..state
of the art for its day..but its day was 50 years ago.
The technology and shock development in general
in l946 was in its infancy. You might be able to "get by" with some stock
shocks for your Sunday afternoon jaunts, but in my estimation, you are
really taking your life in your hands by installing a stock unit for everyday
riding. Take a look at the passenger car shocks of l946..they were Houdilles
for goodness sakes.Tube variety came four years later.
Ron Kemp supplies new shocks by Koni (and there
are possibly some Armstrongs out there as well). I feel confident the VOC
Spares organization has new shocks as well...but if you are a Rider and
you want to hit a bump in the road at 40 plus, I would not only install
the new shocks, but also the Springs that have been developed by Justin
MacKay Smith (phone 540 837-2456). The Thorntons are advertised monthly
in the MPH. Carl Hungness 02/07/01
Standard Shock Absorber:
I've rebuilt near 3 dozen with good success so feel qualified
to offer these few comments. One always finds upon stripping
these that the 2 little O rings fitted at the Works have aged very
poorly being hard. A trip to your local Dixie Bearing or similar
bearing supply will get you new Viton based seals quite cheaply and these
will not lose their superior characteristics over years of exposure to
oils and fuels, etc. Take the seal carrier and the shaft with you to assist
in selecting the correct size. There are several
other improvements one should make while the dismantled shock bits lay
loosely displayed. The upper brass plug/bearing D9/2 has been seen
in at least 3 different forms as to its upper inner edge treatment.
The earliest - just a flat topped hole, and then several variations
of recessed or counterbored hole with radial drillings to release
that oil forced up along the shaft. The first plain version is easily
improved by champhering the upper hole followed by saw cuts in a
cross pattern down to the bottom of the champher. Flatten off any
raised edges and polish that surface.
Now the oil that rises up around the shaft
can gather in the widened area and excape out those slots you have cut
before over pressurizing the lower O ring.
All of these various types of the D9/2 need a
thin flat metal washer/shim positioned above the top of that counterbored
or
champhered plug to give a stable floor beneath
that lower ring, otherwise the rubber ring is able to pooch down in spots
- leaving its designed recess behind - and its outer restrant, and
its ability to grip and wipe the shaft is lost. The second or upper ring
often is able to do likewise into the poorly sized fibre washer above it
there beneath the top or outer plug. This needs
improving in a similar manner.
These shim washers must be a nice running fit
around the shaft and centered so as not to score it. Modern fork
fluid of 15 or
20 weight does far better than motor oil - foaming
less and maintaining its viscosity more effectively. It is tricky
to expell the air and this is never held for long with that shaft
plunging into its inner volume but care and thought can improve upon this.
Sid 02/07/01
Steering
Damper: Very often one finds the Vincent
damper plates greasy from over-use of the steering head grease fittings.
This is asking for trouble ! Remove the assembly and give it a good
cleaning and sanding of the friction surfaces to restore bite. Incorrect
assembly can impare its proper function, and it MUST be able to clamp together
quite noticably, the later double disc pattern is advisable. I always
mark the knob to indicate when barely biting -- and mildly
-- and when fully engaged for speeds above 65/75 mph. This to enable
a glance to inform one that it is indeed tightened to the working mode.
Jack up the front end to ascertain the effectiveness
at selected positions of one's knob, the mark to be pointing dead
ahead.
Racing brake plates up front assist in wobble
control because weight forwards of the steering head compounds the pendelum
effect so overpowering the dampers ability to regain control of the flailing
mass. For the same reason I usually pull-in and lower the headlamps
position by relocating the lower headlight stays to bolts nearby on plate
FF-32. Looks neater and more compact as well. Sid
Biberman 01/25/01
Thornton dampers
outperform the Vincent and Koni by a long shot. You don't have to install
the whole outfit to get the benefit of the damper. The front one
is different from the rear. From experience I can tell you that the Thornton
type front springs are a vast improvement over the stock Vincent double
springs. Mike Hebb 12/29/00
The question was recently posed asking us if Vincent riders
have had any experience with suspension
modifications , and specifically if anyone
had knowledge of the Thornton system.
At the onset I need to say
it is ever-so-easy to be judgemental, particularly about another man's
product. While I like the idea of spirited conversation (particularly regarding
my favorite motorcycle) I do find that more times than not, the negative
attitude prevails when one introduces a new idea.
Yes, I have had some experiencve
with Vincent suspension modification, both front and rear. I covered my
own experiences in an MPH article some months back outlining the springs
and spring boxes made by Justin MacKay Smith. In a word, I had previously
gone to a Vincent spring supplier (in England) with my bike in tow to show
him my fully sprung (seat) and rear suspension arrangement. I had new springs
wound to fit my existing spring boxes, and utilized a combninatin of "C"
and "D" springs up front.
The results of my test were
not completely acceptable. The bike still bottomed out on tall highway
bumps.
I also orderd the Thornton
system and while I was very pleased with the shock absorber Thornton has
made for them, I found it difficult to accept the engineering principles
utilized for the spring box arrangement. It is entirely possible for the
Thornton system to bind and or cock under a given circumstance.
The idea behind replacing the
rear springs is to give the system longer, smoother (and safer) travel.
The springs and attendant boxes made by Justin accomplish the task in the
safest possible manner. He has quite simply made longer springs and boxes
to match. He also supplied me with a set of springs for the front I am
very happy with.
The Thornton system can be
made to work and racer Reg Bolton drew us a fine drawing depicting some
(minor) bracketry he installed on his race bike to keep the Thornton system
from binding.
Overall, however I must say
I was disappointed in the "release" Thornton asks us to sign while utilizing
his product. Never in all my years of purchasing speed, power, or motorcycle
equipment have I been subjected to such a release and it definitely did
not settle well. Signing away one's rights makes me highly suspicious.
I know race car and speed equipment manufactures 'right around the world
and I have never seen another such "release"
Personally, I would not purchase
any system for the Vincent until I saw the unit(s) Justin has come up with.
I have over 20,000 miles in literally all conditions on his system and
have encountered road conditions that I deem un-acceptable to good handling,
yet I have felt extremely safe with his system. I too experienced the dreaded
Vincent Speed Wobble the second day I owned my bike, just in front of an
l8 wheeler, and it took all the desire I had within me to continue to own
the machine.
You are playing with an extremely
dangerous area when modifying the stock system and I cannot warn my fellow
riders enough. Remember, the stock Vincent system on the "C" allows the
rear of the seat to go up and down half the distance of the suspension
travel, and in its day, with everything new and tight, the machine was
adequate. Remember too, the Vincent was probably only the second motorcycle
in the world to have a hydraulic shock absorber, I believe the Velocette
to be the first (with a unit also designed by Phil Irving I believe).
Thus, back in the mid-Forties,
the hydraulic tubular shock was a brand new item, prone to early leakage.
I had mine rebuilt, and then tested on a shock dyno. It was completely
un-aceptable. The Thornton shock was new, safe and worked just fine. However,
there are also other shocks (Koni for example) that work very, very well.
If you are considering a set
of panniers, or a passenger and plan to do some serious riding, I'd recommend
some studious research before purchasing any system. One tank slapper on
a Vincent will make your eyes as big as saucers and you may even wind up
wondering why you ever got on a motorcycle in the first place.
This suspension question is
a very serious one, treat it as such.
Carl Hungness 10/14/00
Return to Home Page of: thevincent.com